Hi Nancy,

When I first contacted Tommy he was into many sources of tech.  He envisioned his bridge as having a lane for each source, including "a bike lane for UCP"!   :-)   :-)   :-)

--Lumni Aster


"nkw" <nkw363@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>Hi Maggie,
>  I was audited by Tom in late 2001.  2 sessions about 4 hours.  Great sessions. I wrote a success story at the time.   I think your observation that one's verbal comm cycle can be different than the written one is a valid.   Tom's command of the King's English is not that great.   One point I would like to make is that my sessions occurred at the time when Tommy was an avowed hard-core pure LRH tech only sort of auditor.   He may still be "standard"on the lower levels.  It is common knowledge that he has altered the upper levels considerably.
>One of Tommy's plus points is a very high energy level.  He is a Social person, thus people like to be around him.   His stats are high for hours in the chair.  Therefore I would not condemn him either. I just don't want to join his group.
>
>Nancy
>
>
>    i wonder if he is different in person than on the site and with his e-mails.  i would be interested to know.  some people are just not good with the written communication cycle.  maybe he is one of them.  does anyone know him personally?  i am interested.  i would stand corrected if i were wrong about him.
>  arc
>  maggi