Thanks Pierre

Had a LFBD on that one. Apparently there was lots of charge there.
thanks jamal


>From: "Class XII Auditor and C/S" <Class_XII@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: Class_XII@hotmail.com, FZAOINT <Members-l@fzaoint.org>
>To: <Members-l@fzaoint.org>
>Subject: Re: [FZAOINT] TRs and Basics E/Os
>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:52:38 -0500 (EST)
>
>My view is quite firm on this.
>
>It is called SQUIRELLING.
>
>I have seen enough of this out-tech (even at Flag) to make me vomit.
>
>Unless I misunderstand what you are describing.
>
>You have an untrained person asking Listing questions on the meters while
>he doesnt even knows the existence of the HCOB "The Laws of Listing and
>Nulling", much less know or apply it. He never read the anti Q & A HCOBS,
>much less done an anti Q & A drill in his life.
>
>Take a look at any metered action written by LRH: It is highly structured
>with a precise patter and specific allowable questions. This hold true for
>False data striping, word clearing, grades auditing, sec-checking, NED, OT
>levels, the Ls.
>
>What you are describing is a "session" where the "practioner" is Q & Aing
>all over the place, and as LRH himself puts it: "driving all over the
>road, into both ditches".
>
>Latent surges on the meter are typically caused by the thetan, not the
>bank (protest is an example), and there is not even a scrap of an HCOB or
>tape that endorses taking such a reaction in auditing.
>
>When I was training as a sec-checker directly under Snr C/S Int and IG
>Tech, anyone on the training program, taking up a latent read in
>sec-checking was getting  the unfortunate auditor virtually "cremated" and
>made to starrate and recite verbatim all pertinent LRH references on the
>matter, until it virtually came out of his ears.
>
>Forgotten by those "modern day onvestigators" is the fundamental datum by
>LRH that the Meter responds proportionally to the amount of ARC in
>session.
>
>Considering that the fact that the average FBI agent is capable of about
>the same amount of ARC as a stone, he may as well simply have quietly turn
>the emeter off and continue his patter of "steering the pc" on imaginary
>reads.
>
>The results would have been identical.
>
>If I must give a pat on the back to those engaged in that practice, it
>must be for having developed on their own a most effective tool for
>spinning any adversary they have choosen to target. (I decided to give
>this 1.1 snide comment, perhaps prompted by the fact that from my
>experience this is the only tone they ever respond to).
>
>AT Flag where this was being practiced with a vengeance, I have had to use
>enough L4BRs and LIC on the "victims" to have put a special order to mimeo
>for more reams of correction lists.
>
>Worse I was called to do no less than 4 Introspection Rundowns at Flag (on
>fully isolated pcs), because they had received such "handling". One of
>them had blown the base after it was being attacked by Flying saucers and
>they were firing at him, another was seeing and communicating with
>"angels", the third one was in a near catatonic state. The first session
>with the fourth one can only be compared to the movie the "Exorcist"
>except for the fact that her head didnt spin on her neck.
>
>I managed to pull all 4 four pcs out of the rut and back to sanity. These
>were some of the most demanding and difficult sessions in my life,
>especially that the stakes for failure were very high: the 4th pc was
>married to the number one TV Anchor in her country. My attempts to blast
>the Ethics officer only resulted in gaining enemies.
>
>I read the original Rollback Telexes when they originally came out and was
>one of the first people to deliver rollbacks (since I could do it in 7
>languages),and none of these "non-BPI" issues was in any conflict with
>standard tech, or even common sense.
>
>Somone dramatizing a whole Track Implant, having the name of Larson was
>responsible for the creation of gang bang sec-checking and "Verbal and
>instant declare", back around 1982. He was in charge of the "International
>Finance Police" and getting that much power quickly went to his head.
>Ironically, one day it became his turn to be "verbally and instantly
>declared", a victim of his own squirrel use of policy.
>
>Pierre Ethier
>
>
> > question about three years ago the philly org had an ethics program
> > where  the EO would put u on the meter and ask if there is any out ethic
> > situation  in your life. then the EO would start an interrogate u saying
> > i know u are  involved in out ethics situation what are they then look
> > at the meter and  take up latent reads and would say in an fbi manner
> > what was that thought  that thought. i did the sec ck crs and never read
> > any lrh issues which  stated the above then i asked where is it writen i
> > was never shown the  source . do u have any insigt to the above action
> > done by the COS
> > jamal
> >
> >
> >>From: "Class XII Auditor and C/S" <Class_XII@hotmail.com>
> >>Reply-To: Class_XII@hotmail.com, FZAOINT <Members-l@fzaoint.org>
> >>To: <Members-l@fzaoint.org>
> >>Subject: [FZAOINT] TRs and Basics
> >>Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 01:59:02 -0500 (EST)
> >>
> >>
> >>I realized after someone adversely reacted to the idea of correcting a
> >> TR that some Scientology fundamentals have become so perverted in COS
> >> that they have now acquired a bad name.
> >>If someone's TR4 is faulty it doesnt necessarily mean that all prior
> >> TRs are in bad shape. A competent person should check and see the exact
> >> TRs that need correction. If TR0 is fine, why spend three week doing it
> >> over and over. If the auditor has a Misunderstood word, false data, or
> >> simply needs more practice on TR4, then that's the TR that needs
> >> addressing. If you get a flat tire from driving over a nail, do you
> >> need an oil change or a battery boost? or do you need to get your jack
> >> and spare out of your trunk???
> >>
> >>Unfortunately a Squirrel group I choose to call Reprehensible
> >> Technology Corrupters (RTC), has choosen to pervert Scientology
> >> Fundamentals in order to satisfy an agenda upon which I can only
> >> speculate at this point.
> >>
> >>TRs are no longer Communication Drills, but endless and dreadful
> >> staring exercizes done to please the "communication standards" of a few
> >>self-appointed authoritarian pea-brains who are re-interpreting the
> >> technology.
> >>
> >>Meter Drills are no longer short exercizes to improve the proficiency
> >> with the meter, but pointless routines to be repeated until one
> >> develops an aversion for the Emeter.
> >>
> >>KSW is no longer seeking to get the Tech right, but a whole-track
> >> dramatization designed to make blind zealots out of Scientologists and
> >> a legitimized avenue to openly dramatize evil intentions toward people.
> >>
> >>Study Tech is no longer learning what is true for oneself, but
> >> accepting blindly any and all data being taught even if they contradict
> >> each other or make no sense.
> >>
> >>Objective Processes are no longer powerfully simple processes designed
> >> to bring the case up to present time, but endless boring processes
> >> continued at nauseam until the disinterested pc approaches a near
> >> catatonic state.
> >>
> >>
> >>Sec-Checking is No longer defined as Auditing, so invalidations and
> >> evaluations are now encouraged techniques used to coerce a pc to
> >> confess whenever a pc cant come with an answer..
> >>
> >>Give TRs, Meter-Drills, KSW, Study Tech, Objectives and Sec Checking a
> >> bad name and what do you get?
> >>- Empty orgs and blown pcs, students and staff.
> >>
> >>
> >>Pierre Ethier
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Members-l mailing list
> >>Members-l@fzaoint.org
> >>http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95.
> > https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members-l mailing list
> > Members-l@fzaoint.org
> > http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Members-l mailing list
>Members-l@fzaoint.org
>http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org

_________________________________________________________________
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account is over
limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


_______________________________________________
Members-l mailing list
Members-l@fzaoint.org
http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org