From: Members-l-bounces@fzaoint.org on behalf of Class XII Auditor and C/S [Class_XII@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 07:40
To: Members-l@fzaoint.org
Subject: [FZAOINT] GOCS

Something has been missing from COS for quite some time now, It is also
often missing in the society at large when things turn strange.

I call it GOCS, short for "Good Old Common Sense".

The line of development for LRH, if you follow up on the logical
developments is generally pretty obvious to "Good Old Common Sense".

Maintaining ARC with a pc, completing auditing cycles of action, not
forcing a pc, running what a pc is Interested in, these seem pretty
evident. Yet they are being violated with a Vengeance at this hour, even
at Flag.

PCs are being put onto endless FPRDs in the middle of Solo NOTS even when
it means interrupting a level that was producing TA and case gain.
Confessionals or FPRD are being "ordered by HCO" until the pc submerges
his protest and submits (or blows), Executive C/Sing is now being
justified under the latest revison of C/S 73 "The No-Interference Area",
obviously written by a number of RTC goons, clueless about the purpose or
meaning of auditing.

What happened to one of the most fundamental principles underlying all
auditing: "if the pc change, do nothing (i.e continue, make him go
through), if the pc doesn't change do something (i.e reprogram the case,
drop the action, do a different action or level, but do not go on)"?

Doing a series of FPRD lists in the middle of an OT level is not
necessarily a bad thing. If the pc cant run the level he is on and through
his action or comments show a need to alleviate himself of past O/Ws
and/or evil Intentions, then it might be a life-saver, and it will have
the pc's interest too.

But to interrupt a winning streak because of a paranoid impulse coming
from a pantywaisted clique, is for all purposes and intents a suppressive
act being committed against the Tech.

I am sorry, I cannot show you the reference, but Flag Security would not
allow me to walk off the Sea Org with a Class X pack tucked under my arm,
so I guess you will have to take my word for it.

There is a bulletin called Auditing and C/Sing Flag Rundowns. In it, LRH
emphasizes that one needs to parallel, the pc's Mind. This requires a
thorough understanding of the Tech and of all the available tools. Few
people train to that level and demonstrate a thorough understanding. Hence
it is kept as a Flag Only issue. This is how things are meant to be
programmed.

For example, L-10 has a minimum of 28 Rundowns, and up to 40 available,
therefore each L-10 is individually programmed to tailor the individual,
since each rundown is meant to address a different facet of the case.

The same thing goes about deciding when to program the Ls and which one to
program first.

Most pcs are programmed to do L11, L11X (L-11 Expanded), L-12, L-10 in
that sequence.

Few people are programmed to do L-10 before OT III.

However some cases are programmed for L-12 first or even L-10 first. Some
people are invited to do L-10 before the OT levels.

The New Vitality Rundown (A Flag Only Rundown) is a little like Expanded
Dianetics, except that it has a strictly tailored program for each pc.
There is no standard New Vitality Rundown program. Each program is
individually written and prepared for the pc.

The same, in most likelihood could be said about doing Dianetics, before
or After the Grades.

I have run dozens of Clears on Grades before Dianetics and dozens, after
Dianetics, depending on how the bridge was drawn at the time.

It became obvious to me  that some pcs would benefit best from doing their
Dianetics first, and others their grades. But making that adjudication
requires a very thorough understanding of the case and the Tech, a skill
that seldom comes without years and years of experience dealing with
literally thousands of cases.

If RTC wrote a Bulletin tomorrow stating that the first step of Grade Zero
consisted of the auditor busting the pc in the Mouth or screaming
obscenities at him would you do it?

A surprising number of auditors at Flag would. Not exactly common sense.

Pierre Ethier




_______________________________________________
Members-l mailing list
Members-l@fzaoint.org
http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org