I don't think I've posted a personal success story here before but today's
wins certainly warrant it.

I have attained the state of OT9 and hereby attest to it.

It is something incredible.

Almost the first thought I had after the cognition was about how LRH
possibly understood it back in 1968.

He said on the class 8 tapes that the tech was there. After that he was just
making it simpler for people and creating an appropriate gradient.

Hitting OT9 was totally unexpected. It just hit like a bolt of lightning.

OT9 is exactly how he talked about the levels above handling BTs.

I'll try not to wander into restimulative OT data in talking about it.

What I have to say first is that my cognitions on hitting the state are a
total validation of correct application of LRH tech. There is no substitute.

The LRH bridge up to OT8 is totally validated for me beyond any slightest
doubt.

To make it to OT9 requires a leap. One MUST be able to audit others and gain
a total certainty about the tech. It is not enough to have an intellectual
understading of it.

The case that one addresses on OT9 is larger than that of a human on the
street by many orders of magnitude.

So a thorough study of class 6 is needed.

I know now  with a total certainty that the approach laid out by LRH is
correct.

I'm like a sizzling potato at the moment with charge equivalent to a lower
grade flying off every minute.

I'll go into a bit more detail below but fair warning is given that I'm
talking about OT data.

OT9 is about orders of magnitude. It is also about interpersonal
relationships.

It is a harmonic of grade zero.

I have to say again that the bridge to OT8, as LRH created it, is something
that I will continue to require.

I have not the faintest clue at the moment how to write up OT9 as a level to
deliver. It just hit me.

However what I can equivocably state is many thousands of hours of solo are
required.

I know that this will not go down well in the FZ however Sec Checks are a
necessary part of OT.

I have to stipulate a rule which is at the moment an arbitrary way of
avoiding the errors of the CofS.

An auditor should not write down details of overts on worksheets. The
terminals should be noted with reads. However, in this society, at this
time, it is not a good idea to write up full details.

The integrity of auditing must be maintained.

The only way I see to do that at this time is to guarantee to a pc that
those things that they disclose don't hit paper.

We have a situation where detailed O/W auditing will be required.

However we must not have a situation whereby unscrupulous "execs" have
access to pc data.

I'll probably write more tomorrow.

--
Ralph Hilton
http://www.ralphhilton.org
Freezone Directory: http://www.freescientology.org
Freezone International: http://www.fzint.net

FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.org
C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org