On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:21:17 -0000 you wrote:

>The last time I saw Claire was in 92 at the base. She was ptp'd and
>enturbulted. Then she was making an effort to liquidate materials she
>had like meters etc. to raise money. I thought she planning on
>leaving the Sea Org then. Or rather, I got the impression she wanted
>to leave and was working on that. Also in 92 there was a mission into
>the base to make some class twelves in a right away style. A group of
>class eights were selected to be trained through class twelve. Pierre
>was still at the base then too I believe. He will recall this better
>than I with more reality but it seems these people went from class
>eight to class twelve in two weeks. I think there were about ten of
>them. I was close to one of these people and I remember asking how
>one could jump so far so fast in a few weeks...from class eight to
>class twelve. He was rather ambivilant about the training cycle and
>said "It's just tr's".  I was left with the impression that the
>difference between a class eight and a class twelve was just a tr's
>course, and that there were tr's practices by these auditors that the
>rest of us were not privvy to. I was hoping for Pierre at sometime to
>define this, what is the difference between a class 12 and an 8? At
>that time during that training cycle in 92 did Pierre get the
>impression that that training push was a hasty / sloppy training
>cycle?  Wiz

I studied the Class 8 materials at Flag and have no doubts about being able to handle any case with standard tech.

After leaving the SO 22 years ago I started to help build up the FZ.

I had read quite a few of the L's bulletins while at Flag. Security was sloppy.

Several write ups appeared on the net about L's. Those from Larry West and any other writings from him are garbage.

I read one write up that contained the same data that I had read at Flag.

I have stated that I will hold the position that the buck stops here and act as the last place to go when all else fails.

Pierre has accepted a similar responsibility for the Americas.

After studying the write up I realized that the style of auditing was the key factor in the L's

Someone recently asked me, when she was here, about the difference.

So I asked a question with Class 4 TRs and then with Class 12 TRs. I think she then got the difference.

KRC subsumes ARC when it is mastered.

The L's are audited from total KRC. The TRs involved might seem out of "ARC" to people at lower levels.  However, in auditing L's, one must directly address the Being. The auditing questions are not just asked in words but they are projected telepathically into the space of the PC. The auditor must have the ability to see the reads on the meter while looking straight at the PC.

Thus a Class 12, if not stably exterior, must be at least exterior enough to maintain that state when asking an auditing question.

So the answer is that yes, the difference is in the TRs. And that is the main difference.

There is a wonderful lecture entitled "Craftsmanship, Fundamentals"

If auditors listen to that and understand it then they will know that the workability of Scientology is contained in fundamentals, not esoterics.

The difference is not ~just~ a TRs course. It is a TRs course. As an OT.




--
Ralph Hilton
http://www.ralphhilton.org
Freezone Directory: http://www.freescientology.org
FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.org
C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org



Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fzaoint/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  fzaoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/