> > The pair of them belong in
cramming.
>
>
> Here I would disagree. Cramming at its best is
very expansive; at its
worse
> it is just another indoctrination.
There's a lot of destim and gain to be
> had by discussing these church
and tech issues openly. "What turns it on
> will turn it off." Just
continue the discussion. If a few sacred cows get
> slaughtered in the
process, so be it. If the argument makes for greater
> certainty about
one's position, then, so be that, too.
>
>
> Ted
Well,
fair point Ted. Mind you, I don't think you've been to Ralph's
place.
Some of what happens there is pure magic. Kind of like you go
there for
getting something fixed or done, Ralph will say OK, maybe make an
excuse
that he's got go see about a program that is compiling or similar,
come back
in a bit for a cup of tea, the convesation turns to something
perhaps quite
bland or innocuous and you get this little suggestion or
comment to look at
something from a viewpoint you haven't thought of.
Often it doesn't hit you
then and there. Indeed sometimes you don't even
notice the gem you've just
been presented with at first. But later, you
go, "holy cow". And the whole
world looks different. Then you get
a session, but you've already handled
what it was you thought you'd got to
handle before your backside even hits
the chair.
Miracles seem to come
as standard in the mountains around Semmering.
Ralph will protest that I
am causing over expectation and that what he
delivers is standard tech and
the result you should expect is what the HCOB
says. Well, the first
time I even opened the comm line I found that a
problem I had been bashing my
head on in the CoS for a quater of century
nearly was gone just on the ack I
got in an email - and - to be fair - I had
the same ack from Edythe as well -
but that was a miracle in itself. Then I
got there and had enough gain
in just a few OT 2 sessions to be worth
multiple lifetimes of hard
labour.
More recently I had been auditing NOTs and something came up more
in the 3
area that nearly knocked me off my feet when I first noticed
it. I figured
it was handled then and there - which it was
primarily. I certainly didn't
mis-handle the matter as such. But
then I was in session at Ralph's and I
noticed some attention on it still and
went blah blah blah about it. I got
an ack and a, 'your TA is floating
- be off with you until tomorrow' type of
end session. Next day I think
it was, maybe it was a session later that
day, I'm not really sure (time
seems to have little meaning these days), and
I still had attention on this
thing - from a slightly different viewpoint
this time. Again I get an
ack and an end session. Later that evening it
really hit. I mean
really. I had so much stuff blow that I began trying to
keep a count
and in the end I couldn't count it all. It was like re-getting
the
whole of 3 again in a matter of minutes rather than weeks.
I still say
send these people to Ralph's place - they won't regret it and
neither will
we.
Nick