On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800 you wrote:

>Ralph said:
>"One has to preserve the right of a being to withhold."
>
>Never heard that one, Ralph. Do hope you say more on it. I think there
>is somethning there to know about. Sure does hit at a mountain of MY
>bpc!!

It goes back to basics of space and energy creation covered in the PDC. To
establish beingness it is necessary to rehabilitate the ability to hold points
apart. If a being cannot withhold then they cannot holds 2 terminals apart and
thus have no space. They collapse into the identity of that from which they
cannot withhold.

Repeated enforced confessions thus disempower a being. "What could you
withhold?" is very effective in increasing intelligence as stated in HCOB 23
July 1960. One of the simplest effective processes in Scientology is "Reach
and Withdraw"

People in many cases cannot think with the tech - they cannot create space to
think for themselves as they cannot withhold.

So one could take up a list of terminals connected with an area of stupidity
and run "What could you withhold from ....... " This should greatly restore
intelligence in that area. Alernating it with "know" beefs it up.

The full theory is covered in the tapes of the 1st Melbourne ACC and the
specific reference on the above process is a lecture on 17 November 1959
entitled "Case Assessment, Part 2".

An effective valence splitter to pull out collapsed space due to enforced
confession is, for example:

1. Think of something you'd be willing for an ethics officer to know.
2. Think of something you could withhold from an ethics officer.

Alt rep. to a standard grades process EP.
--
Ralph Hilton
http://www.ralphhilton.org
Freezone Directory: http://www.freescientology.org
FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.org
C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org

_______________________________________________
Members-l mailing list
Members-l@fzaoint.org
http://fzaoint.org/mailman/listinfo/members-l_fzaoint.org