From: Members-l-admin@fzaoint.org on behalf of
Craig [craigrobart@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003
20:40
To: Members-l@fzaoint.org
Subject: Re: [FZAOINT] what
may have happened with scientology
Sal,
You have seen the light! For me also, it was
Robertson's material that gave me pause to reconsider my allegiances. I went as
far as interviewing old-timer's that were there in the 70s and 80s and
getting their sides to the story. They validated many parts of Robertson's
story. One mission-holder from NYC couldn't bear to stay under the
suppression. Another wildly successful mission-holder I met, Alan Walter, told
us about the suppression and how he was ripped off and forced out of his own
missions, several on the West Coast.
My own last bout with the church had to
do with a meeting with some Sea Org missionaire. For my LOOKING at the internet and reading about the church's
history, I was FORCED to realize that I was in a condition of Enemy to the
church. I said "HOGWASH" and left. Of course, now it seems that it
may be a true condition, with the current leadership the way it is.
Why, have you also read about all the tech alterations going on? Keep digging
into the FreeZone and you'll find the sites. Wonderful shit.
Thanks to the Freezone, the disaffected have a
chance. But it's not smooth-sailing yet, as some have been prosecuted here for
violating copyright laws. Other quite OT people like Alan Walter and
Knowledgism-types have taken the material and just changed the words, not the
meanings, so that they can deliver in a large way again. His group is largely
successful in Texas. I have visited several times. See their pics on the
web at www.knowledgism.com.
So, Good Luck to you, May you find your
Bridge,
Craig
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 3:16 AM
Subject: [FZAOINT] what may have happened
with scientology
I just finished reading bill Robertson's sector nine book
and I realized why the CofS is messed up:
It is very real that
government agencies would view scientology as a threat to their control. Not
to compare ethics to these two groups, but I remember watching a special on
the KKK where FBI, CIA agents said that they comprised about 40% of their
members.
By Robertson's accounts of all the plants he was sure about or
suspected it is not so far fetched to see what happened there too. It is clear
that large numbers of members could wiggle their way in positions of power and
gotten LRH in trouble. Then with him hiding from their damage and his likely
wrongful prosecution, threw out the loyal members in 82. Then with most of the
control it is also not so far fetched that something like an IRS amnesty to
boost the governments plants positions of power in the church for further
control and now they are totally ruining it.
Every year you'd hear
about how all the stats are in power yet the visible people on staff, on
course, became less and less by my observations.
It now makes perfect
sense why when I would read source materials there would be "angles" singing
in the background and around staff "bad to the bone" playing.
I felt
resentment at all the controls of the CofS installed by LRH when I first
arrived but it boggles my mind at just how tough and an organized the effort
was to get him.
It has renewed my respect and ARC for him.
Since
the FBI CIA guys are trained to avoid "lie detectors, E-meter" and they appear
to be in control, and the customary methods they use to control (fear
extortion, ETC.) I have greater repect for what all of you are doing. I
understand why I have to respond 3 time to get information and invited to the
convention. Plus how long it is taking to be assigned an auditor or told where
to go. I see you are a target, the threat now!
Another thought is FBI,
CIA can monitor Internet, Are my E-mails secure? One E-mail asked me my
surname and address. I'm not intimidated and gave it but in makes me wonder?
What I feel most of all is mad as hell!
Sal (is my real name
you loyal officer wannabes, this is how a free being looks and acts)!